1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court upholds Tribunal decision on Income-tax Act interpretation. Rates paid to sister concern deemed comparable.</h1> The High Court dismissed the appeal concerning the interpretation of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal's decision to set aside ... Business expenditure - Disallwance - Excessive and unreasonable payments - Addition for purchase and sales made from sister concern - Finding by Commissioner (Appeal)as well as Tribunal as to genuineness of valuation in Transaction between sister concerns not perverse - Appeal dismissed Issues:1. Interpretation of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding purchases made from a sister concern at rates higher than market rates.2. Interpretation of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding sales made to a sister concern at rates lower than market rates.Analysis:1. The appeal involved the interpretation of section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 concerning the addition of Rs. 6,18,910 made by the Assessing Officer on purchases from a sister concern at rates higher than market rates. The Tribunal set aside the addition, accepting the appellant's explanation that the rates paid were comparable to market rates. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the difference in purchase rates was due to the quality of raw material and that the rates paid were justifiable. The Tribunal affirmed these findings, concluding that no substantial question of law arose as the valuation in transactions with the sister concern was genuine and not perverse.2. The second issue pertained to the addition of Rs. 51,35,244 made by the Assessing Officer on sales to a sister concern at rates lower than market rates under section 40A(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal both found that the appellant's explanation regarding the variation in sale rates based on the quality of products sold to different parties, including the sister concern, was reasonable. Detailed comparisons of sale rates on the same day to different parties were provided, showing variations based on product quality. The Tribunal upheld these findings, emphasizing that the valuation in transactions with the sister concern was genuine and not unjustified.In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal, as no substantial question of law was found in the concurrent factual findings by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding the genuineness of the valuation in transactions with the sister concern.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
