Job-work valuation: sale proceeds of retained cocoa husk not separately includible, and extended limitation failed without suppression.

In job-work valuation under the Ujagar Prints formula, the sale proceeds of cocoa husk retained by the job worker were not to be separately added to the assessable value of cocoa butter and cocoa powder, because the raw material cost had already been included and further loading would amount to double inclusion. The demand based on that inclusion was therefore unsustainable. The extended period of limitation was also unavailable because the department had knowledge of the cocoa husk sales and there was no suppression with intent to evade duty. The duty demand and penalty were set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the sale proceeds of cocoa husk retained by the job worker were includible in the assessable value of cocoa butter and cocoa powder cleared on job work basis; (ii) Whether the demand was barred by limitation.

Issue (i): Whether the sale proceeds of cocoa husk retained by the job worker were includible in the assessable value of cocoa butter and cocoa powder cleared on job work basis.

Analysis: The value for job-work clearances had already been worked out on the basis approved in Ujagar Prints by taking the cost of raw materials together with processing charges and profit. The cocoa husk arose from the very cocoa beans whose cost had already entered the valuation. The Tribunal preferred the line of authority that where the final product is cleared by the principal manufacturer and duty credit is available in the chain, the value of scrap or waste retained by the job worker is not to be separately loaded as additional consideration so as to avoid double inclusion.

Conclusion: The sale proceeds of cocoa husk were not includible in the assessable value, and the demand on that basis was unsustainable.

Issue (ii): Whether the demand was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The department was aware of the sale of cocoa husk as early as February 2001, yet the show cause notice was issued only in August 2002. In the absence of suppression with intent to evade duty, the extended period could not be invoked.

Conclusion: The demand was barred by limitation.

Final Conclusion: The duty demand and penalty were set aside and the appeal was allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: In job-work valuation under the Ujagar Prints formula, sale proceeds of waste or scrap already embedded in the raw material value cannot be separately added as additional consideration, and the extended period cannot be invoked without suppression with intent to evade duty.

---