Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 were sustainable against persons who acquired and dealt with a motor car imported under the Transfer of Residence scheme after the importer had already suffered confiscation, redemption fine and penalty for the original import violation, and whether the two-year no-sale condition continued to apply.
Analysis: The car had originally been imported under the Transfer of Residence scheme in breach of the possession condition, and the importer had already faced confiscation, redemption fine and penalty. On that footing, the importer was treated as not being entitled to the TR concession for the purpose of insisting upon the post-import no-sale restriction. The substantive issue was governed by the import licensing condition under Section XVII of Chapter 87 of Import Licensing Note No. 3, and the earlier decision holding that once penalties are imposed for violation of the import condition, the no-sale condition need not be enforced, was followed as directly applicable.
Conclusion: The penalties on the appellants were not warranted. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an imported vehicle under the Transfer of Residence scheme has already been confiscated and penalised for violation of the import condition, the post-import no-sale restriction cannot be separately enforced against subsequent transferees so as to sustain penalties on that basis alone.