Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the additional customs duty component of the duty paid pursuant to the Settlement Commission order was correctly computed for allowing Cenvat credit.
Analysis: Under section 3(1) and section 3(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, additional customs duty on imported goods is chargeable at the rate equivalent to central excise duty on like goods, and where it is ad valorem, the assessable value is the customs value under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 plus basic customs duty. Applying that method, the total differential duty payable on the imports, in the absence of exports, was Rs. 1,49,39,415/-. Since the export obligation was fulfilled only to the extent of 17.45%, the duty liability was correctly taken at 82.55% of that amount. On that basis, the additional customs duty component of the duty actually paid worked out to Rs. 68,51,381/-, not the lower figure adopted by the department.
Conclusion: The restriction of Cenvat credit to Rs. 57,03,557/- was incorrect, and the assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit of Rs. 68,51,381/-.