Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of Special Additional Duty was barred by unjust enrichment, and whether a Chartered Accountant certificate was sufficient to establish that the duty incidence had not been passed on to buyers.
Analysis: The refund claim arose under Notification No. 102/2007-Customs dated 14.09.2007 in respect of Special Additional Duty paid on import and later refunded on the premise that the goods were sold on payment of VAT. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had produced a Chartered Accountant certificate confirming that the SAD burden had not been passed on. In view of Circular No. 18/2010-Cus dated 08.07.2010, such certificate was treated as sufficient to discharge the requirement relating to unjust enrichment.
Conclusion: The bar of unjust enrichment did not apply, and the assessee was entitled to refund.
Ratio Decidendi: For SAD refund claims covered by the relevant circular, a Chartered Accountant certificate evidencing non-passing of duty incidence is sufficient to overcome the bar of unjust enrichment.