Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on Polycarbonate Sheets used within the factory for collecting, accumulating, and transporting semi-finished goods to the wrapping stage, notwithstanding the objection that the goods were not specifically covered as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The use of the Polycarbonate Sheets was accepted as being for accumulating and transporting semi-finished goods in the course of manufacture. The dispute turned only on eligibility under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal applied the same principle as in cases treating intra-factory material handling equipment used for moving intermediate goods as eligible for credit, and held that the functional use of the item in the manufacturing flow was material. The reasoning emphasised that goods used as part of material handling inside the factory, though not themselves directly embedded in the final product, could still qualify where they were essential to the manufacturing process.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the Polycarbonate Sheets was admissible, and the objection based on Rule 57Q was rejected in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Items used within the factory as material handling equipment for collecting and transferring intermediate goods in the course of manufacture can qualify for Modvat credit even if they are not directly used in the final product.