TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows Modvat credit on Polycarbonate Sheets in manufacturing process, emphasizing material function.</h1> <h3>NESTLE INDIA LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., GOA</h3> NESTLE INDIA LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., GOA - 2007 (216) E.L.T. 707 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:Denial of Modvat credit on Polycarbonate Sheets used in production.Analysis:The appeal challenged the denial of Modvat credit on Polycarbonate Sheets used for carrying processed items within the factory. The appellants argued that the sheets were essential for manufacturing their chocolates and, therefore, eligible for Modvat credit as per a Supreme Court judgment. The revenue disputed the credit, stating that the sheets were not specified as Capital Goods under Rule 57Q and that the appellants failed to produce necessary documentation. The Tribunal accepted the appellants' explanation, noting that the sheets were used for accumulating semi-finished goods. A similar case involving Plastic Crates was cited, where Modvat credit was allowed as the crates played a crucial role in the manufacturing process.In the Plastic Crates case, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of the crates in carrying intermediate products for further manufacturing activities. The lower appellate authority's decision highlighted the essential role of the crates in the manufacturing process, making them eligible for Modvat credit. The Tribunal referenced previous judgments to support the view that material handling equipment used in production or processing of goods qualifies for credit. The Tribunal differentiated between inputs and capital goods, citing relevant case law to justify the decision in favor of the assessee.The Tribunal concluded that the appellants' use of Polycarbonate Sheets was similar to the case of Plastic Crates, justifying the allowance of Modvat credit. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. The judgment highlighted the importance of understanding the role of materials in the manufacturing process and applying relevant legal principles to determine eligibility for Modvat credit.
TaxTMI 