Concessional service tax penalty benefit can still apply where orders do not expressly deny the reduced-payment option.

Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustained because the assessee, acting as a commission agent, collected service charges, issued bills showing service tax, and failed to obtain timely registration or disclose receipts in returns; the plea of bona fide belief was rejected. The concessional penalty benefit was nevertheless made available because the adjudicating and appellate orders did not expressly deny the option to pay the reduced penalty within the stipulated period. The penalty findings remained intact, but relief was confined to payment of the reduced amount on time.

---

---

Issues: Whether the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were sustainable, and whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of concessional penalty by paying 25% of the penalty within the stipulated time.

Analysis: The assessee had rendered business auxiliary services as a commission agent, collected service charges and raised bills showing service tax, yet did not obtain timely registration or disclose the receipts in returns. In view of these facts, the claim of bona fide belief was not accepted and the penalty under Section 78 was held justified. However, as the adjudicating and appellate orders did not extend the option of paying concessional penalty, that benefit was held available in light of the principle recognised for reduced penalty where such option is not specifically denied in the order.

Conclusion: The penalties under Sections 77 and 78 were upheld, but the assessee was granted the option to discharge the penalty at the reduced amount within the stipulated period.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of securing the benefit of reduced penalty, while the substantive penalty findings remained undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the conduct shows deliberate non-compliance inconsistent with bona fide belief, penalty is sustainable, but the benefit of concessional penalty may still be extended if the order does not expressly deny that option.

---