Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Overseas commission qualifies as input service for manufacturing and sales activities under Cenvat Credit Rules.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., JALANDHAR Versus AMBIKA FORGINGS</h3> The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that overseas commission paid by the respondent qualifies as an input service connected to ... Overseas commission paid - not at all an input service having no connection with manufacture or sale activities - Held that: - business promotion activity adds to Revenue by manufacture and sale of incremental quantity, the business promotion activity may have nexus to such sales - service tax paid on such service may be attributable to input service tax - Claim of Cenvat credit is made to avoid cascading effect under Rule 2 (l)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - absence of Revenue's finding that the business promotion has not resulted with any promotion of business activities - Appeal is dismissed Issues:1. Whether overseas commission paid by the respondent qualifies as an input service connected to manufacture or sale activities.2. Interpretation of the term 'promotion' in the context of Cenvat credit eligibility.3. Whether the business promotion activity has a nexus to sales and manufacturing activities for claiming Cenvat credit.Analysis:1. The Appellate Tribunal considered the contention that the overseas commission paid by the respondent was not an input service related to manufacture or sale activities. The Revenue argued that the overseas service did not pertain to manufacturing and extended beyond the place of removal. However, the Tribunal emphasized that if a business promotion activity contributes to revenue through the manufacture and sale of additional goods, it may be linked to sales, making the service tax paid on such services attributable to input service tax. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of avoiding a technical interpretation to deny relief to the respondent under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The legislative mandate indicates that activities integral to business and connected to business operations fall under the ambit of input services, as per Rule 2(l)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that a narrow view should not be taken in such matters.2. The Tribunal delved into the interpretation of the term 'promotion' concerning the eligibility for Cenvat credit. It was noted that when a legislative meaning exists for a term used in law, adopting a dictionary meaning might be unsafe. In the context of business promotion, which contributes to revenue generation for a seller or manufacturer, the Tribunal emphasized that if such activities lead to increased revenue through the manufacture and sale of additional goods attracting excise duty, they may be considered linked to sales. The Tribunal stressed that the focus should be on whether business promotion activities enhance revenue through manufacturing and sales, rather than a strict technical interpretation. The Tribunal highlighted that the broad activities integral to business operations and revenue generation are covered under the definition of input services, as per Rule 2(l)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules.3. The Tribunal analyzed the nexus between business promotion activities and sales/manufacturing operations for claiming Cenvat credit. It was observed that the claim for Cenvat credit aims to prevent a cascading effect under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that as long as the business promotion contributes to revenue through the manufacture and sale of additional goods, it can be considered an input service. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue did not establish that the business promotion activities did not result in any enhancement of business operations. Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, the Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the inclusive nature of activities related to business and revenue generation under the Cenvat Credit Rules.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found