Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and penalty orders passed under the Rajasthan Entertainment and Advertisement Tax Act, 1957 were liable to be set aside for want of reasonable opportunity and violation of natural justice.
Analysis: The assessee had earlier responded to the notice and the matter had been heard and reserved, but no order was passed and fresh notices were later issued. The assessing authority proceeded without adequately considering the earlier detailed reply and without ensuring that the assessee had a fair opportunity to take the assistance of counsel. In the circumstances, the authority ought to have either accommodated the assessee or fixed the matter at Jaipur where both the assessee's counsel and the office of the authority were situated. The resulting assessment and penalty were therefore inconsistent with fair procedure.
Conclusion: The assessment and penalty orders were rightly set aside for breach of the principles of natural justice, and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after granting reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.