Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the recruitment rules permitting promotion to the post of Assistant Architect without requiring registration as an Architect were invalid as repugnant to the Architects Act, 1972.
Analysis: The validity of service rules prescribing qualifications is ordinarily within the State's policy domain, but such rules cannot conflict with a parent or allied statute. The Architects Act, 1972 prohibits use of the title and style of "Architect" by anyone other than a registered architect and gives statutory preference to registered architects for appointment as architects. At the same time, the Act does not bar non-registered persons from performing architectural functions; its prohibition is directed to the use of the protected title. Therefore, the recruitment rules were not invalid merely because they allowed promotion of non-architects to a post carrying architectural functions. However, the nomenclature "Assistant Architect" could not legally be used for a post occupied by a person who is not a registered architect.
Conclusion: The recruitment rules were upheld, but the State was directed to cease using the titles "Architect" and "Assistant Architect" for non-registered persons and to accord statutory preference to registered architects for such posts.