Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeal on Share Issue Expenses & Assessment Disallowances under IT Act</h1> <h3>Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD) Circle-8, Versus Shree Rama Multi-tech And Vice-Versa,</h3> The appeal challenged the disallowance of share issue expenses under section 35D of the I.T. Act. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to bifurcate the ... - Issues involved: Appeal against order of CIT(A)-XIV, Ahmedabad for assessment year 1999-00 and 2000-01.Issue 1: Disallowance of share issue expenses under section 35D- The appeal challenged the deletion of disallowance of share issue expenses of Rs. 23,23,312 under section 35D of the I.T. Act.- The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to bifurcate the expenses related to shares and debenture expenses, and deferred revenue expenses for proper evaluation, following a similar decision in a previous case.- The AO was instructed to verify the payment of employees' contribution to PF and ESI before the due date of filing the return for allowance.Issue 2: Reopening of assessment proceedings and various disallowances for assessment year 2000-01- The appeal contested the reopening of assessment proceedings u/s.147 of the I.T. Act and various disallowances made by the AO.- Grounds related to depreciation, set off of interest income against public issue expenses, disallowance under section 35D, and deduction u/s.80IA on 'other income' were discussed.- The ITAT directed the AO to verify relevant facts and allow the claims based on previous judgments and specific directions.Issue 3: Disallowance of deduction u/s.80IA on 'other income'- The Ld. AR presented details of 'other income' including interest income, exchange rate difference, excise credit, and export incentives.- Certain items were not pressed for want of details, leading to their dismissal.- The ITAT directed the AO to verify the nexus of interest income and allowed deductions on certain items related to industrial undertakings and business income.Issue 4: Disallowance of deduction u/s.80HHC- The Ld. AR did not press this ground, resulting in its dismissal.- General grounds and those not pressed by the Ld. AR were dismissed as not pressed.- The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes based on the discussions and directions provided in the judgment.This summary provides a detailed overview of the issues involved in the legal judgment, highlighting the key arguments and decisions made by the ITAT for each issue raised in the appeal.