TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the expenditure incurred on repairs and maintenance of heavy machinery was allowable as revenue expenditure or was capital in nature. (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 30% on transit mixers, concrete pumps, JCB loaders and mobile cranes used in its hiring business.
Issue (i): Whether the expenditure incurred on repairs and maintenance of heavy machinery was allowable as revenue expenditure or was capital in nature.
Analysis: The expenditure related to spare parts and accessories used for the upkeep and maintenance of existing heavy machinery employed in the assessee's business of hiring earthmoving equipment. The test applied was whether the outlay was for maintaining an existing asset or for bringing a new asset into existence. The comparison made by the Assessing Officer between the written down value of old machinery and the value of replacement parts was not accepted as a valid basis for disallowance. On the facts, no new asset was created and the expenditure was incurred to preserve the operational condition of the existing machinery.
Conclusion: The expenditure was held to be revenue in nature and allowable to the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 30% on transit mixers, concrete pumps, JCB loaders and mobile cranes used in its hiring business.
Analysis: The higher rate of depreciation was examined with reference to the rule granting enhanced depreciation to motor buses, motor lorries and motor taxis used in the business of running them on hire. The assessee's business was to give heavy vehicles and equipment on hire, and the assets in question were treated as heavy commercial vehicles registered with the transport authorities. Support was drawn from judicial interpretation that such vehicles, including mobile cranes mounted on vehicles, fall within the broader category of goods carriages or hire-used vehicles for depreciation purposes.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to depreciation at 30%.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed in respect of both the repair expenditure and the depreciation claim, and the order of the first appellate authority was sustained in full.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure on replacement parts and maintenance of existing machinery is revenue expenditure where it only preserves the asset and does not create a new asset, and heavy vehicles or equipment used in the business of running them on hire may qualify for enhanced depreciation under the applicable depreciation schedule.
TaxTMI 
