Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Food Corporation of India was exempt from property tax under Article 285 of the Constitution on the footing that its property was property of the Union of India.
Analysis: The Corporation was constituted as a body corporate under the Food Corporation Act, 1964 with power to acquire, hold and dispose of property, contract, sue and be sued, and it was treated in the statute as a distinct entity from the Union of India. The Court relied on the principle that a statutory corporation, even if controlled, financed, or directed by the Central Government, does not become the Government itself merely because it may be an agency or instrumentality of the State. Since Article 285 exempts only the property of the Union from State taxation, the Corporation's property could not claim that constitutional protection. The challenge to assessment on the basis of annual value also failed on the facts found, as the valuation was based on agreed fair rent.
Conclusion: The Corporation was not exempt from taxation under Article 285, and the assessment of property tax was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The statutory corporation remained a separate taxable entity distinct from the Union, so constitutional immunity from State taxation was unavailable.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory corporation that is a body corporate with an identity distinct from the Union of India is not property of the Union for the purpose of Article 285 and therefore cannot claim exemption from State taxation.