Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was justified on the facts of the case, and whether the assessee's surrender of income was voluntary so as to take the case outside the rule in MAK Data.
Analysis: The assessee had produced books of account, bank statements, vouchers and other supporting material during the assessment proceedings. The surrender was made after further enquiry, with the explanation that the amount was offered to tax to buy peace. There was no finding that the assessee had failed to disclose material particulars or that the explanation regarding the returned income was unsatisfactory. On these facts, the ruling in MAK Data was held inapplicable because the surrender was not treated as one made after detection of concealed income in the manner found in that case.
Conclusion: The penalty was not liable to be interfered with, and the assessee's challenge failed.