Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a firm, as such, can enter into partnership with another firm or individuals for the purpose of registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and whether the statutory requirements of individual shares and personal signatures can be satisfied where the ostensible partner is a firm.
Analysis: The scheme of registration under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, treats the individual partners as the taxable units and requires the partnership instrument to specify their individual shares. Rule 2 of the Indian Income-tax Rules, 1922, further requires the application to be signed personally by all the partners. Although the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 recognises certain incidents of separateness for a firm, those provisions do not convert a firm into a separate legal entity capable of entering into partnership as such. The inclusive definition of "person" in the General Clauses Act, 1897 cannot be applied where it would be repugnant to the subject and context of section 26A and the allied rules.
Conclusion: A firm as such is not entitled to enter into partnership with another firm or individuals for registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The question referred was answered in the negative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.