Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transferees under a transfer annulled under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act were liable to account for mesne profits from the date they entered into possession or only from the date on which the transfer was annulled.
Analysis: Section 53 made the impugned transfer voidable as against the receiver and capable of annulment by the Court. Until such annulment, the transfer remained effective and the transferees held possession under a valid title. Liability to account for mesne profits arises only when possession is wrongful, and possession under a transfer which has not yet been annulled is not wrongful. Authorities concerning transactions void from inception or cases where no prior setting aside was required were distinguished as inapplicable.
Conclusion: The transferees were not liable to account for mesne profits before the date of annulment, and the claim for profits from the earlier date failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer that is voidable under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act remains effective until annulled, so the transferee's possession is lawful until that date and mesne profits are not recoverable for the prior period.