Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subsequent notification could retrospectively withdraw the exemption granted under the earlier notification and thereby deny the petitioner the benefit of tax exemption.
Analysis: The earlier exemption notification granted tax relief to eligible non-conventional power generation units and consuming units without prescribing any cut-off date. The later notification introduced a cut-off date and additional conditions, which had the effect of taking away exemption in respect of units that had already commenced generation before the amendment. The statutory provisions empowering exemption notifications permitted rescission, but the rescission was to operate prospectively. The Court relied on the principle that a vested or accrued benefit under an existing exemption cannot be destroyed by a later notification with retrospective effect, particularly where the earlier notification had already been acted upon.
Conclusion: The retrospective operation of the amending notification was invalid to that extent, and the petitioner was held entitled to have its claim reconsidered under the unamended notification.