TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Subordinate Judge affirms decree, plaintiff's negligence cited. Appearance rules applied, dismissal based on merits. Second Appeal rejected.</h1> <h3>M. Pazhaniandi Versus T. Naku and Ors.</h3> The Subordinate Judge affirmed the District Munsif's decree, holding the plaintiff negligent. The plaintiff's court presence did not qualify as an ... - The Subordinate Judge upheld the decree of the District Munsif, finding the plaintiff guilty of negligence. The plaintiff's presence in court did not constitute an appearance for the purposes of Order 41, Rule 17. The case falls under Order 17, Rule 3, and the suit was dismissed on the merits, not for default. The Second Appeal was dismissed with costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
