TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Court Affirms Property Title Transfer Date Clarification</h1> <h3>Milkha Singh and Anr. Versus Tara Singh and Ors.</h3> Milkha Singh and Anr. Versus Tara Singh and Ors. - AIR 1973 P&H 445 Issues:1. Validity of compromise in a property dispute.2. Determination of title transfer in a property sale.Analysis:Issue 1: Validity of compromise in a property disputeThe case involved a property dispute over agricultural land in village Bolewal, District Gurdaspur. The dispute arose after the death of Lal Singh, leading to a claim by his son Milka Singh against Sher Singh's alleged will in favor of Kundan Singh. A suit was filed by Kundan Singh and Milka Singh against Ramo for ownership declaration. Ramo contested the suit, alleging a compromised settlement on 7th February, 1961, which was opposed by her. The court framed a preliminary issue on whether the compromise was valid, leading to the addition of Ramo's vendees as defendants. The trial court found no compromise and ruled in favor of Ramo's vendees, declaring them as valid owners. The appellate court affirmed this decision, leading to a second appeal.Issue 2: Determination of title transfer in a property saleThe key argument in the second appeal was the timing of title transfer in a property sale by Ramo to her vendees, defendants 2 to 10. The appellants argued that title transfer occurred only upon registration on 1st March, 1961, rather than the execution date of 28th October, 1960. The court referred to legal provisions, including Section 47 of the Registration Act, and previous court decisions to determine when title transfer occurs in a property sale. The court clarified that registration finalizes the transfer but the title passes from the execution date, as per Section 47. Relying on precedents, the court concluded that the title had passed to the vendees on the execution date, i.e., 28th October, 1960, even though registration occurred later. Consequently, the courts below were correct in their findings regarding the timing of title transfer.In conclusion, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower courts' decisions on the validity of the compromise and the timing of title transfer in the property sale. The court clarified legal principles governing property transactions and emphasized the significance of registration in finalizing the transfer of title.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
