TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals allowed on Henna Powder & Paste duty classification dispute under Central Excise law</h1> <h3>M/s. Sajan Kumar Heerani And Others Versus CCE Delhi-I</h3> M/s. Sajan Kumar Heerani And Others Versus CCE Delhi-I - TMI Issues:Central Excise duty liability classification of Henna Powder and Henna Paste under Chapter Heading 3304 vs. Chapter 1404 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Analysis:The judgment pertains to a batch of appeals where Central Excise duty liability was confirmed on the appellants for classifying Henna Powder and Henna Paste under Chapter Heading 3304, contrary to the appellants' classification under Chapter 1404 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Notification No.11/2017-CE (N.T.) dated 24.04.2017 was referred to during the hearing, which stated that the duty of excise on Henna Powder and Paste need not be paid between 1st January, 2007, and 1st March, 2013. The appellants argued that since the disputed period in all appeals falls within the mentioned dates, the appeals should be allowed, and the impugned orders set aside.The Central Government, under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, has the authority to issue notifications directing non-recovery of excise duty due to general practice. The Notification mentioned above exempts the payment of Central Excise duty on Henna Powder and Paste falling under Chapter 33 between 01.01.2007 to 01.03.2013. Consequently, the Central Excise duty confirmed by the Department in the impugned orders is deemed to be set aside. Notably, the Notification did not specify the classification of the goods in question, leaving the decision on whether to classify under Chapter 33 as claimed by the Department or under Chapter 14 as claimed by the appellants undecided at the current stage.As a result, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed to the extent of the confirmed demands. The judgment emphasizes the significance of the Notification in exempting the appellants from paying Central Excise duty during the specified period, without providing a definitive classification for the disputed goods.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
