Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was justified where the declaration form contained cuttings and overwritings and was found to have been reused.
Analysis: The declaration form produced at the time of interception contained cuttings and overwritings, and the authorities had recorded a finding that it was an earlier used form presented again. The earlier view of the Tax Board on which the appellate relief had been based had already been overruled by the Supreme Court. In the circumstances, the fresh declaration form produced later could not cure the initial defect, and the material on record supported the inference of improper use of the declaration form attracting penalty.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 78(5) was rightly upheld and the assessee was not entitled to relief.