Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (1) TMI 1356 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trust's School Surplus Deemed Incidental, ITAT Upholds Exemption Decision The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) for an assessee trust operating a school, despite generating surplus ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Trust's School Surplus Deemed Incidental, ITAT Upholds Exemption Decision

                          The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) for an assessee trust operating a school, despite generating surplus income. It ruled that the surplus was incidental and utilized for educational purposes, aligning with Supreme Court precedents. The requirement for registration under Section 12AA was deemed unnecessary for claiming the exemption. The ITAT rejected the department's reliance on a previous Uttarakhand High Court decision, emphasizing that surplus incidental to educational activities does not negate the educational purpose.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Exemption claimed under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Requirement of registration under Section 12AA of the Act.
                          3. Consideration of income/expenditure statement showing surplus profit.
                          4. Applicability of the decision of the Uttarakhand High Court in CIT vs. Queens Educational Society and CIT vs. St. Pauls Sr. Secondary School.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad)
                          The primary issue was whether the assessee trust, running a school, was entitled to claim exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) despite generating surplus income. The AO disallowed the exemption, arguing that the trust had objectives beyond education and generated profit year after year. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, and the ITAT upheld this decision, emphasizing that the surplus was incidental and utilized for educational purposes, including infrastructure development. The ITAT referenced the Supreme Court's decision in "M/s. Queen's Educational Society vs. Commissioner of Income Tax," which clarified that a surplus does not negate the educational purpose if it is not aimed at profit-making.

                          Issue 2: Registration under Section 12AA
                          The department contended that the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) should not be allowed as the assessee was not registered under Section 12AA. The ITAT dismissed this argument, noting that Section 10(23C)(iiiad) does not mandate registration under Section 12AA for claiming exemption. The assessee's compliance with Section 10(23C)(iiiad) was sufficient.

                          Issue 3: Income/Expenditure Statement Showing Surplus
                          The AO argued that the income/expenditure statement showed a surplus, indicating profit-making motives. However, the CIT(A) and ITAT found that the surplus was used for educational purposes, such as constructing school buildings and purchasing educational equipment. The ITAT cited the Supreme Court's rulings in "Aditanar Educational Institution vs. Addl. CIT" and "Surat Art Silk Manufacturers' Association," which held that incidental surplus does not imply profit motive if used for educational purposes.

                          Issue 4: Applicability of Uttarakhand High Court's Decision
                          The AO relied on the Uttarakhand High Court's decision in CIT vs. Queens Educational Society, which denied exemption due to surplus generation. However, the ITAT noted that this decision was overruled by the Supreme Court in "M/s. Queen's Educational Society vs. Commissioner of Income Tax," which approved the Punjab & Haryana High Court's decision in "Pine Grove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India." The Supreme Court clarified that surplus incidental to educational activities does not negate the educational purpose. The ITAT followed this precedent, rejecting the department's reliance on the Uttarakhand High Court's decision.

                          Conclusion:
                          The ITAT dismissed the department's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). The ruling emphasized that the assessee's surplus was incidental and used for educational purposes, aligning with the Supreme Court's interpretation of the law. The requirement for registration under Section 12AA was deemed irrelevant for the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). The ITAT's decision was consistent with the Supreme Court's rulings, ensuring that the assessee's educational activities were not undermined by incidental surplus generation.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found