Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Authority could set aside the assessment and remand the matter for fresh verification while simultaneously recording adverse findings on the merits of the assessee's appeal.
Analysis: The appeal orders contained findings rejecting the assessee's grounds, yet the same orders also remanded the matter for fresh verification. Such directions were inconsistent, because once the authority considered that the matter required reconsideration, it ought to have confined itself to a remand for fresh assessment in accordance with law. Adverse observations on the merits were inappropriate at that stage, as the assessing authority, being subordinate, would likely be influenced by them. The remand was therefore permissible, but the findings on merits could not be sustained. The assessee was also entitled to a fresh opportunity and personal hearing before reexamination.
Conclusion: The adverse findings recorded by the Appellate Authority were vacated, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after verification of records and after affording personal hearing to the assessee; the assessing authority was directed to act uninfluenced by the earlier observations.