Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the revision order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential assessment orders was liable to be entertained despite the availability of an effective alternative statutory remedy.
Analysis: The revision order under section 263 was appealable before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, and the petitioner had an efficacious appellate remedy available against it. As regards the assessment orders, the petitioner had already filed appeals before the appellate authority and was pursuing them. In these circumstances, the High Court declined to examine the merits of the revision order or permit the petitioner to bypass the statutory appellate forums.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable in view of the alternative statutory remedy and was rejected.