Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the plaintiff was entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the impugned mark and wrapper, and whether the Court could grant such relief in a composite action notwithstanding the objection to territorial jurisdiction on the trade mark and passing off claims.
Analysis: The defendant's use of the numeral mark and wrapper was found to create an overall deceptive similarity with the plaintiff's well-known soap wrapper, having regard to the get-up, colour scheme, layout and arrangement of lettering. The similarity was held likely to cause confusion in the course of trade and, prima facie, to amount to infringement of the registered trade marks and copyright as well as passing off. On jurisdiction, the Court held that in view of its undoubted jurisdiction under Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957, it could grant interim relief covering the trade mark and copyright aspects of the composite suit at the interlocutory stage.
Conclusion: The plaintiff was held entitled to interim protection, and the injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, advertising or dealing in the impugned goods was granted.