Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on remand, the Income-tax Officer was required first to decide if the assessee's flight kitchen activity constituted an activity qualifying it as an industrial or manufacturing company, and to take into account later High Court authority on the point.
Analysis: The Tribunal's remand could not be understood as authorising computation of the percentage of income from the flight kitchen activity before deciding the foundational question whether that activity itself entitled the assessee to industrial company status. The later decision of the Kerala High Court in Anjali Hotels (P.) Ltd. was held to have prima facie relevance, and the Income-tax Officer was directed to consider Tribunal decisions along with that decision while determining the nature of the assessee's activity. In remand proceedings, the assessing authority was required to take note of subsequent decisions of the High Courts and the Supreme Court relevant to the issue.
Conclusion: The Income-tax Officer was required to decide first whether the flight kitchen activity qualified the assessee as an industrial or manufacturing company, and only then to examine the income computation question; the clarification sought was declined and the application was rejected.