Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether debentures creating security over immovable property were invalid for want of registration and whether the holders could rank as secured creditors.
Analysis: The debentures were issued against specified immovable property, and the question turned on the effect of Sections 59 and 100 of the Transfer of Property Act. Section 59 requires a registered instrument for a simple mortgage, and by Section 4 of that Act it operates supplementally with the Registration Act. After the 1929 amendment, Section 100 applied the provisions relating to a simple mortgage, so far as may be, to a charge created by act of parties or operation of law. The Court held that registration was not incompatible with a charge and that the words "so far as may be" did not exclude Section 59 from the operation of Section 100. On that footing, a charge over immovable property securing money required registration.
Conclusion: The debentures were invalid for non-registration, and the holders were not entitled to rank as secured creditors.
Ratio Decidendi: Where immovable property is made security for payment of money and the transaction does not amount to a mortgage, the provisions governing a simple mortgage apply to the charge to the extent they are compatible, and registration is required where the security falls within the statutory registration regime.