Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a fresh application for temporary injunction was maintainable after an earlier injunction application on the same cause of action had been dismissed as not pressed.
Analysis: The earlier injunction application had been filed, contested, and then withdrawn without any leave to file afresh. The procedural bar in Order 23, Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 prevents a plaintiff from instituting a fresh proceeding on the same subject-matter after withdrawal without permission. By virtue of Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the same procedural principle applies to civil proceedings other than suits, including applications for temporary injunction. In the absence of any change of circumstances, the subsequent injunction application on the same grounds was barred.
Conclusion: The fresh injunction application was not maintainable and the appeal failed.