Best judgment assessment upheld where no material was produced to displace the tax authority's finding.

A best judgment assessment under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act was sustained because the assessee failed to file the return properly and did not produce material to show absence of taxable income. The assessing authority made the assessment after personal inspection of the estate, and the revisional authority confirmed it. Judicial review was refused because interference with a best judgment assessment lies only where it is shown to be perverse, unreasonable, or otherwise legally infirm, and no such defect was established. The writ petition was dismissed and the assessment, together with the revisional confirmation, remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the best judgment assessment made under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act and confirmed in revision was liable to be quashed.

Analysis: The assessee did not file the return in the prescribed manner and did not produce material to substantiate the claim that there was no taxable income. The assessing authority made a best judgment assessment after personal inspection of the estate, and the revisional authority affirmed the assessment. Interference with a best judgment assessment is warranted only if it is shown to be perverse or unreasonable, which was not established on the record. No illegality or infirmity was shown in the revisional order or the assessment.

Conclusion: The challenge to the best judgment assessment failed and the assessment was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the assessment and revisional confirmation undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A best judgment assessment will not be interfered with in judicial review unless it is shown to be perverse, unreasonable, or otherwise legally infirm, and the assessee bears the burden of producing material to displace the assessment.

---