Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of service tax paid on various insurance services used in connection with the manufacturing activity was admissible, and whether disallowance of credit could be sustained when the appellate order gave no reasons for the proposed denial.
Analysis: The allowance of credit on the insured items was not in dispute except to the extent of quantification. The challenge to the direction for quantification did not disclose any specific ground showing error in the appellate authority's approach. At the same time, the appellate authority had not recorded reasons for disallowing credit on the remaining insurance services. As the reasons for disallowance are essential for judicial scrutiny, the denial of credit on those services could not be sustained. The services were treated as integrally connected with the manufacturing activity and as input services for the purpose of manufacture.
Conclusion: The disallowance of Cenvat credit on the identified insurance services was set aside, while the appellate order was otherwise maintained to the extent indicated. The assessee succeeded only in part.