TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether disallowance under section 14A could be made by applying Rule 8D for assessment year 2007-08 and, if not, what quantum was sustainable; (ii) whether section 14A could be invoked while computing book profit under section 115JB; (iii) whether notional interest on sticky loans could be brought to tax; (iv) whether the addition relating to the outgo from foreign buyer's funds and green leaf cess was sustainable; and (v) whether depreciation on plant and machinery purchased out of NABARD funds was allowable.
Issue (i): Whether disallowance under section 14A could be made by applying Rule 8D for assessment year 2007-08 and, if not, what quantum was sustainable.
Analysis: Rule 8D was not applicable for assessment year 2007-08. Even for years prior to assessment year 2008-09, disallowance under section 14A could still be made on a reasonable basis having regard to the facts and circumstances. The estimate adopted by the first appellate authority was treated as a reasonable method.
Conclusion: The disallowance could not be computed under Rule 8D for the year in question, but a restricted disallowance was still maintainable. The issue was decided against both the Revenue and the assessee's cross-objection.
Issue (ii): Whether section 14A could be invoked while computing book profit under section 115JB.
Analysis: The issue was covered by earlier orders of the Tribunal holding that section 14A has no application in the computation of book profit under section 115JB.
Conclusion: Section 14A could not be applied while computing book profit under section 115JB, and the addition was rightly deleted.
Issue (iii): Whether notional interest on sticky loans could be brought to tax.
Analysis: The assessee had not accounted for any interest on the sticky loans, and earlier Tribunal orders had already held that charging notional interest in such circumstances was not permissible.
Conclusion: The addition of notional interest was not sustainable and its deletion was upheld.
Issue (iv): Whether the addition relating to the outgo from foreign buyer's funds and green leaf cess was sustainable.
Analysis: The alleged interest addition was misconceived on facts. Treating the amount as cess on green leaves, the expenditure was of an agricultural character and was covered by the jurisdictional High Court precedent relied upon by the assessee.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition was justified.
Issue (v): Whether depreciation on plant and machinery purchased out of NABARD funds was allowable.
Analysis: The issue was covered by earlier Tribunal decisions in the assessee's own case and in similar matters, where the Revenue's objection to the depreciation claim had been rejected.
Conclusion: The depreciation disallowance was not sustainable and the deletion was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed on all substantial grounds and the assessee obtained no further relief beyond what had already been granted by the first appellate authority.
Ratio Decidendi: For years prior to assessment year 2008-09, Rule 8D cannot be applied mechanically to section 14A disallowance, and while section 14A may still operate on a reasonable factual estimate, it has no application to computation of book profit under section 115JB.
TaxTMI 
