Tribunal Finds Natural Justice Violation, Sets Aside Order, Remands for Fresh Adjudication

The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice in the adjudication process due to inadequate opportunities for hearings, leading to an ex parte order against the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh denovo adjudication order, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair hearing. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration.

---

---

Issues: Violation of natural justice in passing the adjudication order

Detailed Analysis:

1. The adjudicating authority ordered absolute confiscation of Indian and foreign currency recovered from the appellant under specific sections of the Customs Act, 1962, along with imposing a penalty. The appellant challenged the order on the grounds of a violation of natural justice, citing inadequate opportunities for hearings.

2. The appellant, represented by Shri Jitendra Chimanlal Thakkar, contended that the adjudication order was passed in violation of natural justice as only two hearings were provided, with issues such as adjournment requests and delayed hearing notices impacting the appellant's ability to participate effectively in the proceedings.

3. The Revenue, represented by Shri M.K. Mall, supported the findings of the impugned order, emphasizing the importance of upholding the decision made by the adjudicating authority.

4. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions from both parties, acknowledged the violation of natural justice in the adjudication process. It was noted that the appellant was unable to attend the scheduled hearings due to reasons beyond their control, leading to the passing of the order ex parte. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh denovo adjudication order, ensuring the appellant receives a fair opportunity for personal hearing. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, keeping all issues open for further consideration.

---