Section 14 SARFAESI requires no prior decree and in non-metropolitan areas the District Magistrate is the competent authority.

Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is an enabling measure for assistance in taking possession of secured assets and does not require the secured creditor to first obtain a decree from a civil court or the DRT. The statutory process under Sections 13(2), 13(3-A) and 13(4) governs enforcement, and Section 14 operates only as administrative aid. In a non-metropolitan area, the request under Section 14(1) must be made to the District Magistrate, because the provision names that authority and cannot be read as substituting the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The competent forum therefore depends on the territorial setting fixed by the statute.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a secured creditor seeking assistance under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 must first obtain a decree from a competent court or the Debts Recovery Tribunal. (ii) Whether, in a non-metropolitan area, a request under Section 14(1) can be made to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, or only to the District Magistrate.

Issue (i): Whether a secured creditor seeking assistance under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 must first obtain a decree from a competent court or the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

Analysis: The Act is a special recovery statute enabling enforcement of security interest without intervention of the court or tribunal at the stage contemplated by Section 13(4). The statutory scheme requires service of notice under Section 13(2), consideration of the borrower's representation under Section 13(3-A), and resort to measures under Section 13(4) after default. Section 14 is only an enabling provision for assistance in taking possession of secured assets and does not prescribe any pre-condition that the creditor must hold a decree.

Conclusion: No decree from a competent court or the Debts Recovery Tribunal is required before invoking Section 14.

Issue (ii): Whether, in a non-metropolitan area, a request under Section 14(1) can be made to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, or only to the District Magistrate.

Analysis: Section 14 expressly refers to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the District Magistrate, and the text does not mention the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The construction of the provision, together with the scheme of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, shows that the authority designated by the statute cannot be substituted by reading Chief Judicial Magistrate into the provision for non-metropolitan areas. In such areas, the statutory function under Section 14 vests in the District Magistrate.

Conclusion: In a non-metropolitan area, a request under Section 14(1) lies to the District Magistrate and not to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Final Conclusion: The refusal of assistance was sustained, but the creditor was held entitled in law to seek Section 14 assistance without a decree and to approach the competent District Magistrate in the appropriate forum.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 14 is an administrative aid to enforcement of security interest and does not require a prior decree, while the statutory authority named in the provision must be strictly followed according to the territorial setting contemplated by the Act.

---