Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a non-agriculturist surety is liable for the entire debt or only for the scaled down debt when the principal debt is scaled down under the Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act.
Analysis: The liability of a surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless the contract provides otherwise. The Act was treated as effecting not merely a bar of remedy but an extinction of the debt to the extent scaled down, as shown by the language of discharge, the amendment of the decree under Section 19, and the power to enter satisfaction. Since the surety's obligation is accessory to the principal obligation, the surety cannot be made liable for a sum which no longer subsists against the principal debtor. The contrary view that a statutory reduction of the principal debtor's liability leaves the surety liable for the whole amount was rejected.
Conclusion: A non-agriculturist surety is not liable for the entire debt where the principal debt has been scaled down under the Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act, and liability is confined to the scaled down amount.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the principal debtor's liability is extinguished or reduced by statute, a surety's co-extensive and accessory liability is extinguished or reduced pro tanto unless the contract expressly provides otherwise.