Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether PP Rings used for protecting the ends of pipes during handling and transportation were packing material, and if so, whether the assessee was entitled to small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. dated 01-03-2003 in the light of the Board's circular dated 27-11-1987.
Analysis: The PP Rings were used only to protect the threaded ends of pipes during handling and transportation. Packing, in its ordinary sense, includes material that covers or protects goods wholly or partly. On that basis, the PP Rings were treated as packing material. The Board's circular clarified that packing materials such as PP caps and similar items, when manufactured bearing the brand name or trade name of the goods to be packed, would not be hit by the bar against branded goods for SSI exemption.
Conclusion: The PP Rings were packing material and the assessee was entitled to SSI exemption. The duty demand and related confirmation in the impugned order were unsustainable, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.