Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 70 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 could run during the period when the appellate order reducing the estate duty remained in force and the reduced demand had been discharged.
Analysis: The petitioner had been permitted to pay the estate duty in instalments under section 70 and had complied with that arrangement. When the Appellate Controller reduced the demand, the balance payable became nominal and was promptly discharged. During the operation of that appellate order, the liability to pay the enhanced duty did not subsist, and interest under section 70 could not accrue for that period. The subsequent restoration of part of the demand by the Tribunal did not justify charging interest for the intervening period when no further amount was payable under the subsisting appellate order.
Conclusion: Interest was not payable for the period during which the Appellate Controller's order was in force; the demand for interest was liable to be modified to that extent in favour of the assessee.