Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could recall or set aside its signed judgment and order in a criminal appeal under Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and whether its inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 could be invoked for that purpose.
Analysis: Section 362 of the Code imposes a clear prohibition against alteration or review of a signed judgment or final order, except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The provision is wide enough to include the High Court, and the prohibition cannot be circumvented by characterising the relief as a recall of judgment. A recall would in substance efface the earlier judgment and result in a fresh decision, which is nothing but an alteration or review barred by the section. The inherent power preserved by Section 482 cannot be used in a manner inconsistent with an express statutory prohibition, and it does not create a general power to recall a judgment already signed and disposed of.
Conclusion: The High Court had no power to recall or set aside its judgment and order dated 6-11-1981, whether under Section 362 or under Section 482 of the Code.
Ratio Decidendi: A signed criminal judgment or final order cannot be recalled or reviewed by the same court except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error, and inherent powers cannot be used to defeat that statutory bar.