Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the death of the named sole arbitrator terminated the arbitration agreement, or whether the arbitration clause survived so that a substitute arbitrator could be appointed under the Act.
Analysis: The scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 distinguishes between termination of the arbitrator's mandate and extinction of the arbitration agreement itself. Sections 14 and 15 deal with failure, impossibility, termination of mandate, and substitution of an arbitrator; they do not nullify the underlying agreement to arbitrate. Where the mandate of a sole arbitrator comes to an end by death or otherwise, the Act contemplates reconstitution of the tribunal and appointment of a substitute in accordance with the original appointment mechanism. The reasoning also follows the settled view that the word "rules" in Section 15(2) refers to the agreement or institutional mechanism governing appointment, and that the vacancy can be filled when the named arbitrator is unable or unwilling to act. The contrary view that the arbitration clause is wiped out on the named arbitrator's death was rejected.
Conclusion: The arbitration clause survived the death of the named sole arbitrator, and the vacancy could be filled under Section 11 of the Act. The order refusing relief was set aside and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.