1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Calcutta High Court denies security, emphasizes affidavit rules, orders costs. Extension application dismissed, appellants to provide appeal security.</h1> The High Court of Calcutta ruled against ordering security in the case, emphasizing adherence to affidavit rules. The applicant was ordered to pay costs. ... - The High Court of Calcutta ruled that there was no sufficient ground for an order for security in the case. The court emphasized the importance of strictly following Order XIX, Rule 3 regarding affidavits. The applicant was directed to pay the costs of the application. Additionally, the court refused an application for extension of time and dismissed it with costs due to excessive delay. The court later granted the appellants three weeks to provide security for costs of the appeal amounting to Rs. 2,500.