Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation under the income-tax law could be claimed on the portion of duty paid on capital goods for which Cenvat credit was not availed, and whether such claim was barred by the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.
Analysis: Rule 4(2)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 permits only 50% of the duty paid on capital goods to be taken as credit in the year of receipt, with the balance being available in subsequent financial years. Rule 4(4) bars credit only in respect of that part of the value of the capital goods which is included for claiming depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that scheme, there is no prohibition against claiming depreciation on the portion of duty for which credit has not been taken in the relevant year. The earlier rule under Rule 57AC(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was treated as having the same effect.
Conclusion: The claim of depreciation on the unavailed portion of Cenvat credit was permissible, and the demand was not sustainable. The appeal was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where only a part of the admissible Cenvat credit on capital goods is availed, depreciation may validly be claimed on the remaining unavailed portion, because the bar under the credit rules applies only to the portion of value actually included for depreciation.