1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court modifies Tribunal's order on duty deposit discrepancy, aligning amounts with fairness.</h1> The High Court of Gujarat modified the Tribunal's order regarding duty deposit discrepancy between the present petitioner and another company. The ... - Issues involved: Discrepancy in the percentage of duty deposit ordered by the Tribunal compared to a similar case involving M/s. Supreme Glazes Private Ltd.Summary:The High Court of Gujarat heard arguments from both parties and proceeded with the case for final disposal. The petitioner contended that the Tribunal had ordered a higher percentage of duty deposit in their case compared to M/s. Supreme Glazes Private Ltd. where only 8% of the total duty was required to be deposited. The Tribunal's order in the M/s. Supreme Glazes case involved a demand for waiver of pre-deposit of a substantial amount confirmed as duty, interest, and penalties. The issue revolved around the demand of duty on the appellant due to under-valuation of finished goods 'Frit' and clandestine removal, along with exceeding the SSI exemption limit. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a further pre-deposit of a specified amount within a set timeframe, with the balance amounts being waived subject to compliance. The High Court noted the discrepancy in the duty percentage demanded from the present petitioner compared to M/s. Supreme Glazes Private Ltd. and directed the petitioner to deposit a specific amount within a specified period, modifying the Tribunal's order accordingly. The petition was disposed of, and notice was discharged.