Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether clean energy cess was leviable on shale rejects generated during coal extraction; (ii) whether penalty was exigible.
Issue (i): Whether clean energy cess was leviable on shale rejects generated during coal extraction.
Analysis: The applicable definition of specified goods covered raw coal, and shale rejects were treated as part of the raw coal extracted from the mine. On that basis, the cess was considered payable on the raw coal stream from extraction, and the contention that shale rejects were outside the levy was not accepted.
Conclusion: Clean energy cess was leviable on the shale rejects and the related demand was sustained against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether penalty was exigible.
Analysis: The issue was considered to have arisen for the first time before the Tribunal, there was no supporting case law produced by either side, and no mala fide intention was found on the part of the assessee. In these circumstances, penalty was held to be unwarranted.
Conclusion: Penalty was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The demand of clean energy cess was upheld, but the penalty was deleted, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory definition of specified goods encompasses raw coal, cess remains chargeable on extracted shale rejects treated as part of the raw coal, but penalty is not justified in the absence of mala fide conduct and where the issue is debatable.