1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court overturns CIT's revision orders challenging income tax assessment for 2006-07 and 2007-08.</h1> The court set aside the revision orders by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) challenging the initiation of revision proceedings under section 263 of ... - Issues involved: Challenge to the validity of initiation of revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act by Ld. CIT.Summary:The appeals were filed by the assessee challenging the orders passed by Ld. CIT u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. The assessing officer estimated income at 10% of the gross receipts after necessary inquiries. Ld. CIT initiated revision proceedings u/s 263, stating that the methodology resulted in underestimation of total income. The Ld. CIT directed to re-do the assessments by determining income from godown receipts separately. The assessee argued that assessments were completed based on estimates due to lack of proper books of accounts. The assessing officer considered all aspects and proposed to enhance the estimate. The assessing officer's view was deemed plausible, and the revision orders by Ld. CIT were set aside for both years. The assessing officer's actions were considered reasonable, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.