Two-tier arbitration clauses upheld where party autonomy permits appellate arbitral review beyond the first award.

A contractual two-tier arbitration clause providing for a first arbitration in India and a second appellate arbitration in London was held to be permissible under Indian law. Sections 34 and 35 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were read as not expressly or impliedly barring a second-instance arbitral review, and the finality of an award was treated as subject to further recourse agreed by the parties. The arrangement was also found consistent with party autonomy and not contrary to the fundamental policy or public policy of India, so the appellate arbitration mechanism was upheld as valid.

---

---

Issues: Whether a contractual two-tier arbitration procedure, providing for a first arbitration in India and a second appellate arbitration in London, is permissible under Indian law and consistent with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Analysis: The arbitration clause was construed as creating two stages of dispute resolution, the first resulting in an arbitral award and the second permitting an appeal to a second arbitral tribunal. Sections 34 and 35 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were held not to prohibit such a contractual appellate mechanism. The statutory finality of an arbitral award was understood as subject to any further recourse agreed by the parties. The Act was not read as expressly or impliedly barring a second instance arbitration, and such an arrangement was found consistent with party autonomy. The clause was also held not to offend the fundamental policy or public policy of India.

Conclusion: A two-tier arbitration procedure was held to be legally permissible, and the contractual provision for appellate arbitration was upheld as valid.

Ratio Decidendi: Party autonomy allows contracting parties to agree to a second-instance arbitral review, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not expressly or by necessary implication prohibit such appellate arbitration or render it contrary to public policy.

---