TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules agricultural lands within panchayat not capital assets under Income-tax Act</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus PJ. Thomas</h3> The Tribunal determined that the lands sold were agricultural based on evidence like revenue records and cultivation status. The court held that lands ... Agricultural Land, Capital Gains, Income Tax Act, Question Of Law Issues Involved:The issues involved in this case are whether the lands sold were agricultural lands and whether the lands within a panchayat can be excluded as capital assets u/s 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Regarding the first issue:The Tribunal concluded that the lands sold were agricultural based on factual evidence such as revenue records, cultivation status, irrigation benefits, and agricultural income received. The Tribunal's decision was supported by valid materials, leading to the correct conclusion that the land in question was agricultural.Regarding the second issue:The interpretation of u/s 2(14) excludes agricultural land as a capital asset within the limits of a municipality, not a panchayat. The land sold was in a panchayat, not a municipality, and therefore falls outside the scope of section 2(14). Despite arguments from the Revenue, the court held that a panchayat cannot be considered under the exclusion clause of agricultural land as a capital asset. The Tribunal's decision to delete the tax on capital gains from the sale of agricultural lands was justified, and the tax case petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
