Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods manufactured by the appellant were classifiable under Tariff Heading 4821 00 as paper or paperboard labels of all kinds, whether or not printed, or under Tariff Heading 4901 90 as other products of the printing industry.
Analysis: The decisive factor was the nature of the goods as emerging from the printing process. Heading 4901 90 broadly covers products of the printing industry, while Heading 4821 00 is confined to paper or paperboard labels of all kinds. On the record, there was no material showing that the goods were paper or paperboard labels, and the Revenue also did not establish such a description. Since the goods were printed products coming out of the printing industry, the more specific and appropriate tariff entry was 4901 90.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Tariff Heading 4901 90 and not under Tariff Heading 4821 00. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The tariff dispute was resolved in favour of the appellant, and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A printed product arising from the printing industry is classifiable under the tariff entry specifically covering products of the printing industry, and not under a more confined entry for paper or paperboard labels unless the latter description is established on the evidence.