Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under Section 11AC could be reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals) from the equal amount of duty to Rs. 1 lakh.
Analysis: The penalty had been proposed in the show cause notice and confirmed in adjudication under Section 11AC. The appellate authority reduced it only on the view that there was no suppression of facts, but did not record a finding that penalty under Section 11AC was inapplicable or identify any other statutory basis for imposing a reduced penalty. In view of the settled law that, where Section 11AC applies, the appellate authority has no power to arbitrarily scale down the statutory penalty, the reduction was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The reduction of penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals) was held to be impermissible and was set aside in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Once penalty is attracted under Section 11AC, it cannot be reduced by the appellate authority without a lawful basis in the statute.