Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (3) TMI 598 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal adjusts tax assessments for 2006-07 and 2007-08, allowing appeals on commission income and cash credits. The tribunal partially allowed the appeals of the assessee in a tax matter for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. The tribunal made adjustments to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal adjusts tax assessments for 2006-07 and 2007-08, allowing appeals on commission income and cash credits.

                          The tribunal partially allowed the appeals of the assessee in a tax matter for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. The tribunal made adjustments to various additions and disallowances, including recalculating commission income for the seasonal business, deleting unexplained cash credits after satisfactory explanations, and modifying agricultural income estimation. The tribunal directed the assessing officer to consider the revised figures in determining the taxable income for the respective assessment years.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 24 lakhs towards commission income on an estimate basis for AY 2006-07.
                          2. Addition of Rs. 11 lakhs as unexplained cash credit from Aboobaker Poothayil for AY 2006-07.
                          3. Addition of Rs. 3 lakhs received from Joseph Albert towards rent deposit for AY 2006-07.
                          4. Addition of Rs. 16,19,079 as unexplained investment in the building based on the valuation report for AY 2006-07.
                          5. Disallowance of Rs. 2,25,000 out of the agricultural income disclosed by the assessee for AY 2006-07.
                          6. Estimation of commission income to the extent of Rs. 56 lakhs for AY 2007-08.
                          7. Disallowance of four credits totaling Rs. 60 lakhs for AY 2007-08.
                          8. Addition of Rs. 10 lakhs as unexplained cash credit from M.M. Abdul Kareem for AY 2007-08.
                          9. Addition of Rs. 20 lakhs in respect of credit appearing in the name of M.K. Hamsa for AY 2007-08.
                          10. Addition of Rs. 10 lakhs as unexplained cash credit from Aboobaker Poothayil for AY 2007-08.

                          Summary:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 24 lakhs towards commission income on an estimate basis for AY 2006-07:

                          The tribunal found that the estimation of commission income for the entire year was unjustified as the business was seasonal, conducted from December to April. The commission was recalculated at Rs. 1,000 per lakh, resulting in an estimated income of Rs. 6,17,917 for the period of 50 days. The tribunal directed the assessing officer to take the income from commission business at Rs. 6,17,917 for AY 2006-07.

                          2. Addition of Rs. 11 lakhs as unexplained cash credit from Aboobaker Poothayil for AY 2006-07:

                          The tribunal found that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of the Rs. 11 lakhs credit, which was a loan against a fixed deposit. The identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction were established. The addition of Rs. 11 lakhs was deleted.

                          3. Addition of Rs. 3 lakhs received from Joseph Albert towards rent deposit for AY 2006-07:

                          The tribunal found that the amount received was a security deposit for lease and not income. The rent agreement and the inclusion of rent in the return of income supported this. The addition of Rs. 3 lakhs was deleted.

                          4. Addition of Rs. 16,19,079 as unexplained investment in the building based on the valuation report for AY 2006-07:

                          The tribunal held that without rejecting the books of account, the reference to the valuation officer was misconceived. Following the judgment of the Apex court in Sargam Cinema vs Commissioner of Income-tax, the addition based on the valuation report was deleted.

                          5. Disallowance of Rs. 2,25,000 out of the agricultural income disclosed by the assessee for AY 2006-07:

                          The tribunal found that the estimation of agricultural income at Rs. 75,000 was very low. Considering the fertile land in Kerala, the tribunal estimated the income at Rs. 2 lakhs from 5 acres of land, modifying the disallowance to Rs. 1 lakh.

                          6. Estimation of commission income to the extent of Rs. 56 lakhs for AY 2007-08:

                          The tribunal found that the business was seasonal and estimated the turnover for five months at Rs. 18,53,75,100. The commission was calculated at Rs. 1,000 per lakh, resulting in an estimated income of Rs. 18,53,751. The assessing officer was directed to take the commission income at Rs. 18,53,751 for AY 2007-08.

                          7. Disallowance of four credits totaling Rs. 60 lakhs for AY 2007-08:

                          For the credit of Rs. 20 lakhs from Afsal P.Y., the tribunal found that the source was satisfactorily explained. The addition was deleted. The credit of Rs. 10 lakhs from M.M. Abdul Kareem was set aside for further examination regarding the withdrawal from the NRO overdraft account. The credit of Rs. 20 lakhs from M.K. Hamsa was found to be satisfactorily explained, and the addition was deleted. The credit of Rs. 10 lakhs from Aboobaker Poothayil was also satisfactorily explained, and the addition was deleted.

                          8. Addition of Rs. 10 lakhs as unexplained cash credit from M.M. Abdul Kareem for AY 2007-08:

                          The tribunal set aside the issue for further examination regarding the withdrawal from the NRO overdraft account.

                          9. Addition of Rs. 20 lakhs in respect of credit appearing in the name of M.K. Hamsa for AY 2007-08:

                          The tribunal found that the credit was satisfactorily explained, and the addition was deleted.

                          10. Addition of Rs. 10 lakhs as unexplained cash credit from Aboobaker Poothayil for AY 2007-08:

                          The tribunal found that the credit was satisfactorily explained, and the addition was deleted.

                          Conclusion:

                          Both appeals of the assessee were partly allowed. The tribunal modified the orders of the lower authorities and directed the assessing officer to make the necessary adjustments as per the findings.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found