Assessee's appeal partially allowed: Disallowances deleted, interest upheld. Revenue's appeal dismissed.

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal by deleting disallowances under Section 14A and on interest-free advances. The addition of interest received on society deposits was upheld. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, confirming the deletion of society maintenance charges and the proportionate disallowance of interest.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
2. Addition of interest received on deposits belonging to the society.
3. Deletion of proportionate disallowance on account of diversion of borrowed funds.
4. Deletion of addition on account of society maintenance charges.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee, a company engaged in the business of Promoters and Builders, filed its return declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee had claimed exempt income and disallowed expenses under Section 14A. The AO included investments in share application money and partnership firms, resulting in a disallowance of Rs. 2,94,01,003. The CIT(A) upheld the inclusion of share application money but excluded the share application money received by the assessee. The Tribunal found that no dividend was received from the group companies, thus excluding such investments from disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal also excluded share application money pending allotment from disallowance, following decisions from other benches. The Tribunal concluded that no disallowance under Section 14A was warranted as the assessee’s own capital and free reserves were sufficient to cover the investments in partnership firms.

2. Addition of interest received on deposits belonging to the society:
The AO added Rs. 12,24,391 as interest income, which the assessee claimed was received on deposits made on behalf of the society and should not be taxed as its income. The CIT(A) upheld the AO’s addition, noting that the assessee had claimed TDS credit on this interest. The Tribunal found no evidence that the money was handed over to the society or shown as a liability, thus upholding the CIT(A)’s decision.

3. Deletion of proportionate disallowance on account of diversion of borrowed funds:
The AO disallowed Rs. 58,75,491 as interest on loans given to subsidiaries without charging interest. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, finding commercial expediency in the advances. However, the CIT(A) directed a disallowance of Rs. 12,95,32,777 for advances to Sinew Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Riverview Properties Pvt. Ltd., which were not justified by commercial expediency. The Tribunal, noting that the assessee’s own capital and free reserves exceeded the interest-free advances, deleted the enhanced disallowance, following the decision in Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd.

4. Deletion of addition on account of society maintenance charges:
The AO disallowed Rs. 2,80,224 for society maintenance charges, arguing that the expenses were not related to any business receipts. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, recognizing that maintaining buildings until the formation of a society is a normal business practice for builders. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, confirming that the expenses were incurred in the normal course of business.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal partly, deleting the disallowances under Section 14A and on account of interest-free advances, while upholding the addition of interest received on society deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue’s appeal, confirming the deletion of society maintenance charges and the proportionate disallowance of interest.

---