Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim arising out of provisional assessment could be entertained when the final assessment order was not challenged by appeal.
Analysis: The goods were assessed provisionally and the assessment was later finalised with a direction to deposit differential duty on depot sales. The refund claim was founded on the difference between factory gate value and consignment sale value, but the finalisation of assessment did not accept the assessee's claim regarding excess payment of duty. Since no appeal was filed against the final assessment, the subsequent refund claim could not be used to indirectly question that concluded assessment. The principle applied was that a final assessment order must be challenged in the prescribed manner and cannot be bypassed through a refund proceeding.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.